Adipurush Genuine review | Bollywood Movie | 700 Cr | Prabash, Kriti Sanon starrer Movie

Adipurush, the highly anticipated movie starring the renowned Telugu actor Prabhas, has been released in cinemas worldwide. This mythological drama presents a fresh narrative of the ancient Hindu epic, Ramayan. Directed by Om Raut, the film features Prabhas portraying the character of Lord Ram, while Kriti Sanon takes on the role of Sita. Additionally, Sunny Singh portrays Lakshman, and Saif Ali Khan brings the character of Ravan to life.

The film is being developed on a grand scale and is jointly produced by D Series and Retro Piles.

Release date: 16 June 2023 (India)

Director: Om Raut

Producers: Om Raut, Bhushan Kumar, Prasad Sutar, Krishan Kumar

Budget: 700 crores INR (2023)

Distributed by: AA Films, UV Creations, People Media Factory, KRG Studios

From my perspective, it appears that the filmmakers missed the opportunity to delve deeper into the characters of Ram and Sita. Instead, the focus seemed to be solely on the narrative of Ram rescuing Sita. The Ramayana is a vast epic that cannot be fully encapsulated in a single movie, and it seems that the writers simply surrounded the film with what they found most "interesting," overlooking the broader aspects of the story.

Also Read :ADIPURUSH BOX OFFICE Worldwide COLLECTION DAY 20 | Bollywood Movie | Prabash, Kriti Sanon Starer Movie

The film was supposed to portray the epic story of Ramayana. However, the creators chose to prioritize incorporating imaginative creativity alongside subpar VFX implementation. This decision has ultimately resulted in a disappointing and messy viewing experience that is likely to leave viewers dissatisfied.

Adipurush seems to be an endeavor to capitalize on emotions, but unfortunately, it falls short in evoking any genuine emotional response.

Prabhas is undeniably a talented actor, but unfortunately, his recent performance does not quite match his inherent potential. It appears that the filmmakers have attempted to capitalize on his immense popularity, yet Prabhas seems to be lacking his usual spark. Throughout the film, his body language appears somewhat listless, giving the impression of someone who is lost or disengaged. While he may be striving to portray a sense of tranquility in line with his character, there seems to be a noticeable distinction between calmness and a lack of energy.

Furthermore, the portrayal of Prabhas in Adipurush appears heavily manipulated and digitized. His physique seems incredibly artificial, possibly a result of excessive VFX usage. While it's possible that his physique is genuine, the overreliance on visual effects makes it appear more artificial than authentic.

In my perspective, Prabhas appears to be stuck in his Bahubali persona, lacking the necessary serenity required to portray Lord Ram. He seems more focused on his combat skills rather than embodying the essence of the character.

In my opinion, Kriti Sanon's portrayal of Sita was not bad; rather, it was quite decent. Despite the limited role she had as the damsel in distress, I believe she delivered a commendable performance in the film.

Ramayan is believed to have originated between 400 BCE to 300 BCE. However, it is important to note that the color choices in the costumes of Adipurush, such as the inclusion of purple, violet, or lavender in Sita's saree, do not align with the color palette that would have existed during the era of the Ramayan.

Lakshman's role in this rendition of the Ramayana seems quite limited. He appears to be relegated to a mere formality, standing by Rama's side without much significant contribution.

Since the Ramayana is set in the Indian subcontinent, it is reasonable to assume that the Vanar sena would primarily consist of monkeys native to India, rather than including large apes like Gorillas from Africa.

The Lanka Dahan scene could have been the highlight but the dark tone ruined everything.

Indrajeet lights up Hanuman's Tail: Jali na.. Jiski jalti hai..wahi janta hai

Hanuman ji: Kapda tere baap ka. Tel tere baap ka. Aag bhi tere baap ki. Toh jalegi bhi tere baap ki.

In each cinema hall, a seat was designated for Lord Hanuman, despite the fact that he never speaks the dialogue being delivered.

Valmiki ji vividly described Lanka as "sone ki Lanka," a city made of gold. However, in Om Raut's adaptation, Lanka seems to have taken on a completely different portrayal, resembling a dark coal mine akin to those seen in KGF.

In this movie, Ravana is depicted riding on a dragon, which bears a striking resemblance to an oversized and poorly designed bat. It's worth mentioning that in traditional accounts, Ravana was known to possess the magnificent Pushpaka Vimaan. However, this adaptation diverges by showcasing him mounted on a dragon instead.

Ravana was not only a formidable adversary but also a learned sage, as evidenced by Rama's request to Lakshman to seek wisdom from Ravana in his final moments. However, the portrayal of Ravana in Adipurush appears to undermine his profound character, coming across as more of a comedic depiction that lacks coherence and depth.

If you are interested in watching the film, it ultimately comes down to your personal choice. However, it would be unfair to compare it with the iconic Ramanand Sagar's Ramayan. Such a comparison would disregard the immense respect and admiration we hold for the masterpiece created by the late Ramanand Sagar Sir.

Enough hate for ADIPURUSH! Now just sit down enjoy these memes!